Book Review -- Ibsen's "A Doll's House"


english interpretation of Ibsen's "A Doll's House"

    "A Doll's House" is classified under the "second phase" of Henrik
Ibsen's career.  It was during this period which he made the transition
from mythical and historical dramas to plays dealing with social problems.
It was the first in a series investigating the tensions of family life.
Written during the Victorian era, the controversial play featuring a female
protagonist seeking individuality stirred up more controversy than any of
his other works.  In contrast to many dramas of Scandinavia in that time
which depicted the role of women as the comforter, helper, and supporter of
man, "A Doll's House" introduced woman as having her own purposes and
goals.  The heroine, Nora Helmer, progresses during the course of the play
eventually to realize that she must discontinue the role of a doll and seek
out her individuality.
    David Thomas describes the initial image of Nora as that of a doll
wife who  revels in the thought of luxuries that can now be afforded, who
is become with flirtation, and engages in childlike acts of disobedience
(259).  This inferior role from which Nora progressed is extremely
important.  Ibsen in his "A Doll's House" depicts the role of women as
subordinate in order to emphasize the need to reform their role in society.
    Definite characteristics of the women's subordinate role in a
relationship are emphasized through Nora's contradicting actions.  Her
infatuation with luxuries such as expensive Christmas gifts contradicts her
resourcefulness in scrounging and buying cheap clothing; her defiance of
Torvald by eating forbidden Macaroons contradicts the submission of her
opinions, including the decision of which dance outfit to wear, to her
husband; and Nora's flirtatious nature contradicts her devotion to her
husband.  These occurrences emphasize the facets  of a relationship in
which women play a dependent role:  finance, power, and love.  Ibsen
attracts our attention to these examples to highlight the overall
subordinate role that a woman plays compared to that of her husband.  The
two sides of Nora contrast each other greatly and accentuate the fact that
she is lacking in independence of will.
    The mere fact that Nora's well-intentioned action is considered
illegal reflects woman's subordinate position in society; but it is her
actions that provide the insight to this position.  It can be suggested
that women have the power to choose which rules to follow at home, but not
in the business world, thus again indicating her subordinateness.  Nora
does not at first realize that the rules outside the household apply to
her.  This is evident in Nora's meeting with Krogstad regarding her
borrowed money.  In her opinion it was no crime for a woman to do
everything possible to save her husband's life.  She also believes that her
act will be overlooked because of her desperate situation.  She fails to
see that the law does not take into account the motivation behind her
forgery.  Marianne Sturman submits that this meeting with Krogstad was her
first confrontation with the reality of a "lawful society" and she deals
with it by attempting to distract herself with her Christmas decorations
(16).  Thus her first encounter with rules outside of her "doll's house"
results in the realization of her naivety and inexperience with the real
world due to her subordinate role in society.
    The character of Nora is not only important in describing to role
of women, but also in emphasizing the impact of this role on a woman.
Nora's child-like manner, evident through her minor acts of disobedience
and lack of responsibility compiled with her lack of sophistication further
emphasize the subordinate role of woman.  By the end of the play this is
evident as she eventually sees herself as an ignorant person, and unfit
mother, and essentially her husband's wife.  Edmond Gosse highlights the
point that "Her insipidity, her dollishness, come from the incessant
repression of her family life (721)."  Nora has been spoonfed everything
she has needed in life.  Never having to think has caused her to become
dependent on others.  This dependency has given way to subordinateness, one
that has grown into a social standing.  Not only a position in society, but
a state of mind is created.  When circumstances suddenly place Nora in a
responsible position, and demand from her a moral judgment, she has none to
give.  She cannot possibly comprehend the severity of her decision to
borrow money illegally.  Their supposed inferiority has created a class of
ignorant women who cannot take action let alone accept the consequences of
their actions.
    "A Doll's House" is also a prediction of change from this
subordinate roll.  According to Ibsen in his play, women will eventually
progress and understand her position.  Bernard Shaw notes that when Nora's
husband inadvertently deems her unfit in her role as a mother, she begins
to realize that her actions consisting of playing with her children happily
or dressing them nicely does not necessarily make her a suitable parent
(226).  She needs to be more to her children than an empty figurehead.
From this point, when Torvald is making a speech about the effects of a
deceitful mother, until the final scene, Nora progressively confronts the
realities of the real world and realizes her subordinate position.
Although she is progressively understanding this position, she still clings
to the hope that her husband will come to her protection and defend her
from the outside world once her crime is out in the open.  After she
reveals the "dastardly deed" to her husband, he becomes understandably
agitated; in his frustration he shares the outside world with her, the
ignorance of the serious business world, and destroys her innocence and
self-esteem.  This disillusion marks the final destructive blow to her
doll's house.  Their ideal home including their marriage and parenting has
been a fabrication for the sake of society.  Nora's decision to leave this
false life behind and discover for herself what is real is directly
symbolic of woman's ultimate realization.  Although she becomes aware of
her supposed subordinateness, it is not because of this that she has the
desire to take action.  Nora is utterly confused, as suggested by Harold
Clurman, "She is groping sadly in a maze of confused feeling toward a way
of life and a destiny of which she is most uncertain (256)."  The one thing
she is aware of is her ignorance, and her desire to go out into the world
is not to "prove herself" but to discover and educate herself.  She must
strive to find her individuality.
    That the perception of woman is inaccurate is also supported by the
role of Torvald.  Woman is believed to be subordinate to the domineering
husband.  Instead of being the strong supporter and protector of his
family, Nora's husband is a mean and cowardly man.  Worried about his
reputation he cares little about his wife's feelings and fails to notice
many of her needs.  The popular impression of man is discarded in favor of
a more realistic view, thus illustrating society's distorted views.
    Ibsen, through this controversial play, has an impact upon
society's view of the subordinate position of women.  By describing this
role of woman, discussing its effects, and predicting a change in
contemporary views, he stressed the importance of woman's realization of
this believed inferiority.  Woman should no longer be seen as the shadow of
man, but a person in herself, with her own triumphs and tragedies.  The
exploration of Nora reveals that she is dependant upon her husband and
displays no independent standing.  Her progression of understanding
suggests woman's future ability to comprehend their plight.  Her state of
shocked awareness at the end of the play is representative of the awakening
of society to the changing view of the role of woman.  "A Doll's House"
magnificently illustrates the need for and a prediction of this change.

--rhmmmm, that's a paddlin'



























A Comparison and Contrast In Both A's Worn By Hester and Dimmesdale




A Comparison and Contrast In Both A's
Worn By Hester and Dimmesdale


    The two A's worn in the novel by both Hester and Dimmesdale are dramatically
different, yet they are born and made by the same identical sins.  These letters are also
differentiated by the infinitely changing emotional state and physical well being of the
character, the towns views of morality and  natural order, and the affecting environment.
The two sins of most importance in the novel and that serve the greatest beneficiality in the
appearance of the A's are--of course-- adultery and hypocrisy. 
    The separation in the appearance of both of the A's begins with each characters
own personal interpretation of the extremity of their sins.  Where Hester's A is beautiful
and artistically done ("fantastically embroidered and illuminated upon her bosom; pg.37)
her interpretation of the extremity of her sins is one of self composure and nonchalantness.
She views her sins solely as a "violation in the natural order" of the environment and
therefore cannot even perceive her sin as being evil except through outside brainwashing.
While Dimmesdale's personal interpretation as to the extremity of his own sins is a
"violation of God's law," which is the law that he is totally dedicated to and supported by.
Dimmesdale's interpretation of his sin is much more severe than Hester's, it is a breach and
direct contradiction of his own self consciousness and physical existence.  Therefore the
appearance of his A, even though it is never directly described in the novel, must be raw,
jagged, and brutally crooked (...a ghastly rapture; pg.95).  Maybe Dimmesdale's self torture
is so horrifying or inconceivable that it is either indescribable, (...too mighty to be
expressed only by the eye of his figure; pg.95), or best left up to the reader's imagination.
Unlike Hester, Dimmesdale, because of self interpretation, cannot in any way conceive his
sins of being anything but evil.
    Although the appearance of the A's are proportional to the interpretation by each
character; also the appearance of the A's is directly correlated between the consequences
each character receives because of their sins, both Hester's and Dimmesdale's punishment
is introduced through a new character and some sort of isolation.  The new character's are
a form of abstract contrasting where each new character is an extension of the sinner's "A"
itself.  Where as Chillingworth is a doubled extension of Dimmesdale's consciousness;
Pearl is a contrast to Hester's creativity, patience, and composure.  Dimmesdale's
punishment through Chillingworth is one of mental bombardment and spiritual torture
which supports the theory that Dimmesdale's A must be horrifically putrid and
indescribable.  Pearl's punishment towards Hester is one of irritation that attempts to
counter balance Hester's everlasting patience and composure.  Because Hester does not let
her irritation get to her and remains constantly tranquil, the A that she wears (ie. the
extension of the A she bears) is as beautiful and natural as she is.
    So the A's worn in the novel, even though from the same origin, are the exact
antithesis of each other separated by personal interpretation and individual consequences.
Where one character's beauty and open mindedness to her crime and punishment makes
her A and her punishment (Pearl) natural and beautiful.  While the other character's torture
and self hatred of himself and his crime make the burden that he carries much more heavy.
Dimmesdale's A and the extension to his A (Chillingworth) are ugly, and brutal.

























Movie Review - A Clockwork Orange: Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish


A Clockwork Orange: Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish
 
 
        A Clockwork Orange received critical acclaim, made more than thirty
million dollars at the box office, and was nominated for various awards; however,
this esteemed film was outlawed from the nation of Great Britain in order to
curb its immoral content from permeating society.  Before all the controversy
began, A Clockwork Orange was a novel, written mostly in Russian, by Anthony
Burgess.  Stanley Kubrick is known to critics as a film maker who probes the
dark side of human psyche.  Kubrick has also directed films such as Dr.
Strangelove, The Shining, and Full Metal Jacket.  In each of these movies the
audience delves into the evil side of the main character. Great Britain had this
film removed from theaters across the country because the government justly
illustrated there was a connection between the movie's graphic violence and an
increased crime rate.
        In Clockwork . . . , there are unquestionably  violent and graphic
actions. Multiple beatings, a rape, and a murder are performed by the lead
characters. These crimes are drug induced.  Before going out, the gang goes to
the "milk bar" for some "milk plus" which is riddled with amphetamines.  The
first violent act came not more than ten minutes into the movie.  It was when
the boys, led by Alex, beat a helpless wino that asked them for some change. The
gang then strode away as if nothing occurred.  They struck him repeatedly with
canes and they kicked him a few times to the job.  Next, the boys went to see a
rival gang.  This other group was in the middle of raping a woman when Alex and
Company came in and intervened.  They proceeded to beat the other gang members
to a pulp.  Then, they went to the house of a writer, to burglarize it.  While
there, they brutalized the writer and his wife.  Alex raped the wife in front of
the writer and then started to sing "Sing'n in the Rain" as he pummeled the old
man.  Alex's final act of violence came at the house of a rich health spa owner.
The gang went there with the intent of robbing the place, but the woman who
lived there was alert to the scheme and called the police.  She attacked Alex
and he defended himself with a sculpture of male genitalia.  The fight ended
when Alex crammed the statue in the mouth of the victim, and killed her.  These
were some of the more graphic scenes, which aided Britain's decision to ban the
film.
        Incidents from this film triggered an onslaught of violent crimes across
the country of Great Britain.  Numerous copycat crimes were reported which
mimicked to exact detail the grotesque murder and rape scenes found in Clockwork.
The most notable copycat crime was in Britain where a woman was raped and beaten
by a group of thugs who sang "Sing'n in the Rain" as they carried out their
ruthless act of violence.  When questioned by police, one of the thugs commented,
"I got the idea to beat this b**** from a movie I saw." The movie turned out to
be none other than Clockwork....
        Stanley Kubrick has also been responsible for additional films that are
bleak, pessimistic, and sometimes terrifying.  Not only is this his style, but
it is also his means of conveying a very sublime personal message.  Kubrick
believes that contemporary society is a very tragic and violent place.  This
message comes across very clearly in Clockwork Orange.  It is through this film
that Kubrick explores the nature of violent crime and in doing so brilliantly
satirizes the deterioration of society and its values.
        Although Kubrick's message may be sincere, his methods exploit the
intentions of video imagery and demean his viewing audience.  Films of this
nature have an incredible power to induce its viewers into committing violent
actions.  This theory is not ingenuous and has been supported by many prominent
members of the psychological community.  For this reason, I believe the film
needs to be formally banned.  Although it played to sellout crowds in London for
nearly a year, it introduced weak moral standards and a glorification of
violence to the public. This film was best received by the college aged youths
of Great Britain. This is a very impressionable time in the life of a person and
could influence them into justifying violence and the abuse of women.  The
British government made the right decision in banning the movie and protecting
the ailing moral standards of Great Britain.
        As stated previously, many scholars believe that  A Clockwork Orange
was responsible for a wave of copycat crimes and an increase in the crime rate.
This theory can be supported by the fact that in the viewing area where
Clockwork was shown there was a dramatic increase in crimes directly related to
scenes from the movie.  Even if the percentage of the increase in crime was
minuscule, this does not underscore the value in banning the film.  Does not
saving just one life justify banning the content of this heinous video?  I
wholeheartedly believe the answer to this question is yes. Human life is worth
much more than one man's sarcastic dissertation on violent crime.
        What will be next--a young girl brutally raped and killed, an innocent
child tortured by ruthless villains, and old man shot down in cold blood?  One
would think a society as educated as ours would recognize the danger in
glorifying these films of violence and gore.  Our children have a hard enough
time determining right from wrong.  Movies such as Clockwork... only add to the
moral decay of our society.  If society is to work toward the esteemed goal of
building a kinder, gentler nation, censorship must play a key role in our
dauntless journey. 
 
 

Movie Review -- A Clockwork Orange by Anthony Burgess




A Clockwork Orange

    The freedom of choice and the rehabilitating form of corrections encase the realm of A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess.  It produces the question about man's free will and the ability to choose one's destiny, good or evil.
"If he can only perform good or only perform evil, then he is a clockwork           orange-meaning that he has the appearance of an organism lovely with colour and juice but is in fact only a clockwork toy to be wound up by God or the Devil or State"(Burgess ix). 
Burgess expresses the idea that man can not be completely good or evil and must have both in order to create a moral choice.  The book deals upon reforming a criminal with only good morals and conditioning an automated response to "evil."  Burgess enforces the idea of the medical model of corrections, in terms of rehabilitating an offender, which is up to the individual.  That one should determine the cause and then find an exclusive treatment to resolve that individual's  case, then apply it.  This is the case with the character Alex, a juvenile delinquent  introduced into prisonization then conditioned by governmental moral standards.  This lack of personal moral choice imposed upon Alex creates conflicting situations in which he has no control over.  This is apparent when trying to readjust into society.   As conflicts arise within the spectrum of criminal justice the main focus is revolved around the corrections aspect of reforming the criminal element.
    Within the confines of the seventies Londoner.  The character, Alex is created as the ultimate juvenile delinquent leading a small gang.  Living within his own world the use of old Londoner language and attire reflect the non-conformity with society.  Let loose within a large metropolitan, Alex is engulfed in the affairs of several criminal practices, from rape to aggravated assault.  As a juvenile delinquent, Alex is finally caught and seen as an adult offender.  Like all offenders he promotes his innocence and sets blame upon  his companions.  "Where are the others? Where are my stinking traitorous droogs? One of my cursed grahzny bratties chained me on the glazzies. Get them before they  get away. It was their idea, brothers. They like forced me to do it"(Burgess 74).
 Betrayed by his cohorts Alex is beaten by local officials and confesses to all the crimes.  As a point to retribution a sergeant states, "Violence makes violence"(Burgess 80) and proceeds to through Alex back into the cell.  All the while Alex detests the treatment and conditions of the local jail, " So I was kicked and punched and bullied off to the cells and put in with  about ten or twelve other plennies, a lot of them drunk"(Burgess 81).  Unlike the fair treatment of most juveniles Alex was finally getting the taste of adult corrections, being held in a drunk tank along with other felons.  Faced with the reality of prison life, Alex is introduced to prisonization by the same system which incarcerated him.  Showing him one must be tough and violent to survive within the penal system.
    The term prisonization refers to the effect when an offender is subjected to the culture, morals, rules, and values of a penal institution. Then this is inscribed into his or her own behavior and deems them fit as a norm.   This is the case involving Alex when he must prove his worth in a correctional institution by beating a fellow inmate.
"If we can't have sleep let's have some education, our new friend here had better be taught  a lesson ...I fisted him all over, dancing about with my boots on though unlaced, and then I tripped him and he went crash crash on the floor.  I gave him a real horror show kick on the gulliver"(Burgess 102).
Although being brutal deems fit for Alex, he realizes that only repentance and good behavior in the eyes of the officials can release him from the jaws of justices.    So in order to be viewed as a reforming criminal Alex turns to religion.  As the prison minister clearly states,
"Is it going to be in and out of institutions like this, though more in than out for most of you, or are you going to attend to the Divine Word and realize the punishment  that await the unrepentant sinner in the next world, as well as in this?"(Burgess 90)
and the main focus for reforming is in the hands of God and individual
 moral choice.   Through religion Alex soon becomes a model prisoner, externally,
yet internally still willing to do anything to get out.  This also included experimental rehabilitation methods done by the state.
    Being a juvenile in an adult prison one would have the urgency to be released as quickly as possible.  When the word got out of a new experimental reforming process and a chance for early release, it immediately caught Alex's attention. To be chosen, this meant constant pressuring and questioning to the officials, plus showing that he is trying to reform.  " You've been very helpful and, I consider, shown a genuine desire to reform.  You will, if you continue this manner, earn your remission with no trouble at all"(Burgess 94).  However Alex's intent on reforming was not a religious aspect but the quickest.  He finally realizes a new way to get out and questions the proceedings. "I don't know what it's called, I said, All I know is that it gets you out quickly and makes sure you don't get in again"(Burgess 95).   However the minister has doubts about the medical treatment techniques involved in forcing a person to be morally better.   He brings up the question of what makes a real moral person. "I must confess I share those doubts.  The question is whether such a technique can really make a man good.  Goodness comes from within, 6655321.  Goodness is something chosen.  When a man cannot choose he ceases to be a man"(Burgess 95).  This does not deter Alex from the thought of early release but only intensifies his desires.  With his determination and pure will Alex is finally permitted to be experimented on for rehabilitation. 
    With an early release in site Alex's willingness overshadows any curiosities of the treatment. Transferred from a state prison to a private facility insures his release from incarceration.  "In a little over a fortnight you will be out again in the big free world, no longer a number"(Burgess 108).  With the increase in population comes an increase crime, this has also brought on encouraging new rehabilitating techniques to corrections.  Stated by one government official the importance of reforming in corrections rather than retribution.
"The government cannot be concerned any longer with out moded  penalogical theories.  Cram criminals together and see what happens. You get concentrated criminality, crime in the midst of punishment . . . Kill the criminal reflex, that's all"(Burgess 105,106). 
The rehabilitating technique used upon Alex is that of responsive conditioning with the use of drugs and visual aids.  Conditioning is the implementation of either teaching or forcing one to feel or think a certain way when given a decision.  Alex is therefore forced to feel and think negative responses when shown evil sites or thoughts.  Yet the an error had occurred when the state was conditioning "good" into him.  The use of classical music along with the treatment conditioned Alex to respond to that as well.
As Alex detested the use of music, he states the cruelty  of the technique, "But it's not fair on the music. It's not fair I should feel ill when I'm slooshying lovely Ludwig van and G.F. Handel and others"(Burgess 133).  Yet the state feels the use of music is only an enhancement to the treatment, "It's a useful emotional heightener, that's all I know"(Burgess 131).  As the treatment ends the sick feeling is only increased when Alex is confronted with any "evil."  With this conditioning set in place Alex is finally released into society and deemed healthy, pure of all morals. 
    The readjustment into society's values seems to be  the main question.  Was the implementation of conditioning a person to strictly good morals proper and humane?  As the title suggests one can not be purely good or evil to be a man.  One must have both in order to create humanistic choice.  If not, the creation would be that of a robot like person incapable of feeling or self awareness.  As Alex is released into the world as the states' example of a "healthy" person, he is tested by all extremes. One test was  the incapability to defend himself against the smallest attacks on his character.  Another error the state had provided is the use of music in the treatment of Alex.  Not only does he feel physically sick when he thinks or looks at violence but also when he hears classical music.  "It was that these doctors bratchnies had so fixed things that any music that was like for the emotions would make me just sick like viddying or wanting to do violence"(Burgess 161).   Within the conditioning techniques of repulsing him to violence, the state had also forced him to hate music.   The use of this correctional treatment failed due to the implementations on morality of human choice.  Is it better to have a criminal make human choices, good or bad, or a purely good person not capable of making any choices.  As most opinions state, criminals should all be locked up or dealt with in some harsh manner.  There are also those who believe that offenders are diseased by some element and can and/or should be cured.  As far as corrections is concerned, society can not lock up every offender and can not come up with plausible means of curing the criminal element. With the rise in population there will always be a  rise in crime. However this does seem to be the present trend, 5.3 million people were on probation, in jail, in prison, or on parole in 1995 (B.J.S. 1).   As seen in Alex's case the corrections techniques to cure the element did not work.  Perhaps the best means was to incarcerate him for his term and let him pay his debt to society.  The only correct method of corrections is that of self correcting ones.


























A brief history of led zeppeln and its musical impact




    Tell someone to name a band from the 1960s and '70s and you could probably listen to a dozen answers before hearing the same one twice.  The overwhelming amount of talent squeezed into these two decades has produced some of the most popular, most powerful, and in some cases, the most bizarre music ever. Led Zeppelin, The Beatles, Jimi Hendrix, The Rolling Stones, The Yardbirds, Janis Joplin, Bob Dylan, Elvis Presley, Queen, Aerosmith, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, The Eagles.... All were from this era that seemed to glorify music as no other time period did, or ever will.
    The amount of evolution of music that occurred in this time period is amazing as well.  The mainstream went from listening to songs like Bill Haley and the Comet's "Rock Around The Clock," to The Beatles' frightening "Revolution 9." 
    While these two examples may seem completely different, they are not as distant as one might think.  Nearly all music from the '60s and '70s was bred from its earlier ancestors.  Music has been constantly evolving, and during the two decades in question, it underwent a radical change like never before.
   





The New Yardbirds
    In early 1968 the music group The Yardbirds was in shambles.  Their last, and half-put --together album "Little Games" was a total flop and the band had to struggle to have the release of the album in the UK stopped.  On March 30, the group allowed a taping of their concert in Madison Square Garden to be considered for a live album to be released later.  They easily convinced their record contractor, Epic Records, to ditch the project.  The lead guitarist of The Yardbirds, Jeff Beck, had suffered from a mental breakdown a few years earlier and could no longer handle the pressure of touring.  The band members, Keith Relf, Chris Dreja, Jim McCarty, and Jimmy Page decided to throw in the towel and let the band collapse.  Playing wasn't the same rush it used to be, and it just wasn't fun anymore.  Each member elected to follow their own projects.  Dreja planned a career in photography, McCarty and Relf intended on starting bands of their own.  Lead guitarist, Jimmy Page was given legal rights to the band's name, songs, and albums.  However, along with the rights that Page was given, were 10 tour dates that still needed to be honored in Scandinavia.  Page needed to construct a new band in a matter of two months time. 
    In July '68, Page met ex-session guitarist and phenomenal arranger John Paul Jones (b. John Baldwin, June 3, 1946, Sidcup, Kent).  Willingly joined in on bass.  19-year old vocalist, Robert Plant (b. August 20, 1948, West Bromwich, W. Midlands.) is asked to perform with The New Yardbirds. Plant accepts and leaves his homeland in the Midlands with only his subway fair in his pocket.  The last link to the chain was John Bonham (b. May 20, 1948, Bromwich) on drums. 
    The band finished their ten date tour of Scandinavia with some unexpected success.  Everywhere they went people were asking how a band like this could go unnoticed.  The unique blend of blues-influenced rock, and guitar-riff based songs blew their audience away.
    On October 15, 1968, Led Zeppelin, made up of Page, Plant, Jones and Bonham, made it's official debut at Surrey University.  The group began touring the US, backing up such headliners as Vanilla Fudge, and The MC5 shortly thereafter.  Instantaneous recognition followed.  The groups popularity was soaring.  On January 31, '69, Led Zeppelin opened for Iron Butterfly, then one of the world's biggest bands.  Led Zeppelin received such a resounding approval from the audience, that Doug Ingle, lead singer for Iron Butterfly decided to scrap the show.  Reason being are that Iron Butterfly was afraid that they can't produce such an effect on their crowd... in their own concert...in which they are headlining.
    Led Zeppelin soon became a headliner in their own right.  Within eight months of their official debut, Led Zeppelin were at the top of the bill at the Playhouse Theater in London, and the Pop Proms at the Royal Albert Hall in London.  On October 17, '69, a year and two days from the bands conception, Led Zeppelin played in Carnegie Hall, ending a ban on rock groups at the concert hall, originally caused by the Rolling Stones in 1965.  While playing in Denmark, Eva von Zeppelin, relative of the designer of the airship, Ferdinand von Zeppelin, threatened to sue the band if they used the name in the country.  Led Zeppelin played under the alias The Nobs.
    The first album Led Zeppelin climbed to #10 in the US and to #6 in the UK.  Album two, entitled Led Zeppelin 2, moved up to #1 in both the US and the UK, staying on the charts for 98 in the States and an astounding 138 weeks in Britain.
    Six straight #1 albums in either the US or the UK.  Countless sellout concerts.  Records for box office drawings.  Records for attendance.  51,000 tickets for 3 shows Earls Court, London sell out in less than two hours. International fame. No other group had ever become so popular in such a small period of time. Led Zeppelin was revolutionizing music as they went.  While most bands were shunned from playing a song different from it sounds on the record, Led Zeppelin was free to roam in their music.  It wasn't unusual to hear a song that would be half-an-hour long, as opposed to its counterpart on the album, which was only five minutes long.  These lengthy jam sessions diguised as concerts gave way to new ground being touched musically.  Led Zeppelin introduced the world to the music of black artists such as Muddy Watters, Otis Rush, Otis Redding, and Willie Dixon.  Pieces of songs from the 1930s were being worked into their own music, as in their covers of Dixon's You Need Love, and Rush's Can't Quit You, and it was working.  The blues riffs incorporated into their own music later influenced bands heavily, and opened doors to new tastes in music for the predominately American audience.  The most significant thing about Led Zeppelin's music today, is that it doesn't sound dated.  The music seems similar to music today.  The lasting impression of their music is obvious, and can be heard in any Rock band of today.
    Unfortunately, the machine that was Led Zeppelin came to a screeching halt on the morning of September 25,  1980.  When band members decided to go into Bonham's bedroom to pull a prank on him in his sleep, Bonham was found dead.  After a night of heavy drinking, Bonham had turned the wrong way in his sleep, and asphyxiated himself upon his own vomit.  A statement was released on December 4, 1980, stating that the band could not go on in its present state.  After 11 incredible years, the band could not function with "the loss of our dear friend."  Led Zeppelin had owned the 70s, and they were going to finish their reign quietly, and let the throne open to the next "supergroup."  As suddenly as Led Zeppelin began, it had ended even more so.  The giant had fallen.
   
    "As it was, then again it will be,
    Though the course may change sometimes,
    Rivers always reach the sea."
                -Ten Years Gone
                    Led Zeppelin
     

























20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA





20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA

by Jules Verne

   
    The news spread worldwide about a serpent-like creature.  Supposedly,  part of the whale family has been ramming ships and sinking them with ease.  The large ship named the Abraham Lincoln was sent out to find and kill this  beast.  An attack of  the monster left Professor Aronnax  and his long time sidekick Conseil thrown overboard.  Ned Land, master harpooner was thrown overboard as well.  An iron-plated submarine saved their lives.  When taken aboard the submarine they were treated with hostility.  With an introduction to Captain Nemo they became passengers aboard the Nautilus.  They were astonished by the Nautilus on how  it could dive down to the ocean depths to see all that the sea had to offer.  Professor Aronnax  and Conseil found the ocean depths to be a  new world!
    Many life and death experiences made Ned Land feel uneasy about his new  life aboard the
Nautilus.  He was determined to escape.  Captain Nemo took them to many exquisite places.  They
experienced hunting and searching for pearls, VigLo Bay, a hollowed out volcano, and the underwater city of Atlantis.  Captain Nemo took them to the South Pole, where no man had been before and Captain Nemo was the first to go there.  They almost died leaving the Great Ice Barrier.  Then they fought with giant squid.  Captain Nemo seemed to be seeking revenge on ships from his own country.  He used the powerful  Nautilus as a weapon to sink many ships.  After 10 months of being aboard they completed their
underwater exploration covering 20,000 leagues under the sea.  A   Maelstrom hit the Nautilus and Professor Aronnax, Conseil and Ned Land, already in the dinghy ready to escape, were thrown from the submarine.  They floated to safety and returned to their homeland. The mystery  remains.  Nobody knows what happened to the Nautilus and its infamous Captain Nemo.